|
Funds Flag Rise in Price
of Fuck-all

After Australian private health
funds today unveiled their proposal for a 5% to 7% increase in the cost
of private health insurance premiums the Federal Government promised the
new deal would be 'heavily scrutinised' before it is approved with a small
face-saving reduction in the New Year. If the proposal is approved a fifth
consecutive annual increase to health fund members costs at double the
rate of inflation will be introduced in April 2006.
While the Australian public flocked
to the heavily-promoted schemes several years ago at the time of their
introduction, the numbers of people signing on for private health care
have since plateaued.
Saccharine spokesmouths for the
health funds warn a rash of pragmatism among Australians has seen health
funds used by consumers in a way that sometimes compromises the profits
of private health insurance corporations and forces increased costs for
members. Where it is clearly ideal in terms of corporate returns that
exclusively fit and healthy people join health funds, it was always anticipated
that a broad cross-section of the population would take advantage of private
insurance. But the public has instead cheated the private health care
system. Those who are more likely to need health care services - the elderly
and infirm - have created a dangerous imbalance in the private health
sector by signing on in greater numbers and for more substantial coverage
than others. Meanwhile those who are healthy and unlikely to require expensive
medical procedures have taken a self-serving and unco-operative attitude,
staying away from expensive private health funds in an obstinate show
of rude good health.
As a result the large corporations
that run health insurance in Australia have had little option but to massively
escalate costs, draw more heavily on the public purse in the form of the
30% subsidy paid by the Government to private health funds, and at the
same time impose large additional or 'gap' payments on those requiring
medical treatment.
This last impost has steadily
increased in recent years and now averages $720 per hospital procedure.
While this may seem absurd, and contrary to the intention, application
or concept of health insurance, it must be remembered the large 'gap'
payments are the result of the manipulation of the health system by a
recalcitrant public.
Due to this consumer intransigence,
community minded corporations struggling to bring improved health services
to all solvent Australians are placed in an invidious position, criticised
on all sides by a bitter nation unwilling to properly fund the private
health care system single-handedly preserving the viability of inefficient
public health.
Obviously, this is not a time
to refer to the profits, executive incentive schemes and shareholder returns
of health insurance funds. The mention of profits, or of shareholder returns,
or of executive incentive schemes, in the context of an increase in a
taxpayer-subsidised premium, is inappropriate. Best reserved for the reporting
season, for the AGM.
The appropriate discussion to
be had annually in the context of private health care premiums is a sensible
discussion of the high cost of health care, and of the need for incentives
to bring those recalcitrant and self-interested young and healthy people
into private schemes.
|